Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2011 21:28:56 +0100 From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no> To: mdf@FreeBSD.org Cc: FreeBSD Arch <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Automagic SYSCTLs Message-ID: <867hdyvw53.fsf@ds4.des.no> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinMuQGmNmP2v-GkypqxqprBjcZKZ5y2%2BbU6TAQe@mail.gmail.com> (mdf@freebsd.org's message of "Fri, 21 Jan 2011 09:04:28 -0800") References: <AANLkTi=cbdS0g370r=X%2B=uSd0vsRdC0oRkugq-nsBpgy@mail.gmail.com> <86hbd2bgyw.fsf@ds4.des.no> <AANLkTinMuQGmNmP2v-GkypqxqprBjcZKZ5y2%2BbU6TAQe@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
mdf@FreeBSD.org writes: > Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav <des@des.no> writes: > > - does this break the KBI? (I assume it does, almost inevitably) > It can be made gradual, such as #defining SYSCTL_ADD_INT to use the > new interface (but this only works at the moment with OID_AUTO and I'd > rather not add a nbr parameter to the macro). I wrote KBI, not KPI, but if this is done before 9.0 and not backported, it shouldn't be an issue. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?867hdyvw53.fsf>