Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2005 09:49:31 +0100 From: Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org> To: Sergey Matveychuk <sem@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/net/cacti Makefile ports/net/cacti/files pkg-install.in Message-ID: <1131094171.20288.0.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz> In-Reply-To: <200511040713.jA47Dafp075583@repoman.freebsd.org> References: <200511040713.jA47Dafp075583@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-qzuFIt6i0SSVhmE4lKiG
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO8859-2
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sergey Matveychuk p=ED=B9e v p=E1 04. 11. 2005 v 07:13 +0000:
> sem 2005-11-04 07:13:36 UTC
>=20
> FreeBSD ports repository
>=20
> Modified files:
> net/cacti Makefile=20
> net/cacti/files pkg-install.in=20
> Log:
> - Fix permissions for scripts/
> =20
> Note: I'd like to stick the schema where PORTREVISION reflects
> a vendor patch level. So first digit(s) will the verndor
> patch level and second one will a port revision level.
Vendor patch level should be included in PORTVERSION. PORTREVISION is
exclusively for changes that does not contain upstream code updates.
BTW what's up with ports/87332 ? Is it coming?
--=20
Pav Lucistnik <pav@oook.cz>
<pav@FreeBSD.org>
Geography is only physics slowed down, with a few trees stuck on it...
-- Terry Pratchett
--=-qzuFIt6i0SSVhmE4lKiG
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQBDayCbntdYP8FOsoIRAgwPAJ9dijgIcdtKKnaMtTW1uEHTu8lBuwCeO784
QoOSecd4CFbpehto6bn7fAI=
=JBg1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-qzuFIt6i0SSVhmE4lKiG--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1131094171.20288.0.camel>