Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2002 17:40:08 -0700 (MST) From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> To: sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: __sF Message-ID: <20021102.174008.16163522.imp@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <20021102190642.GA28971@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <20021102181031.GB28779@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20021102185841.GZ62585@procyon.firepipe.net> <20021102190642.GA28971@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message: <20021102190642.GA28971@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> writes:
: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=1755928+1759974+/usr/local/\
: www/db/text/2002/freebsd-current/20021013.freebsd-current
You should be linking against the -stable versions of these items as
well as the libc.so.4. If you don't, then you are asking for
problems. Maybe you can kludge it to make libc.so.5 work, but the
whole reason that it is .5 and not .4 is that it is not binary
compatible with .4, and for more reasons than just __sF.
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021102.174008.16163522.imp>