Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 16:52:00 -0500 From: Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu> To: Peter Jeremy <peterjeremy@optushome.com.au>, Lyndon Nerenberg <lyndon@orthanc.ca> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Unfortunate dynamic linking for everything Message-ID: <p0600203dbbe4370a25f4@[128.113.24.47]> In-Reply-To: <20031120095214.GA68334@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> References: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1031118233432.99345H-100000@fledge.watson.org> <p06002033bbe0acb7b8c0@[128.113.24.47]> <2147483647.1069240727@[192.168.42.6]> <20031120095214.GA68334@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 8:52 PM +1100 11/20/03, Peter Jeremy wrote:
>On Wed, Nov 19, 2003, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
> >--On Wed, Nov 19, 2003, Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu> wrote:
> > >
>> > have a: chflags ldcache /bin/sh
> >
>>Shouldn't that be 'chmod +t /bin/sh' ???
>
>Definitely. Why waste a new bit when there's already a
>perfectly good one that is (or was) defined for the purpose.
Two reasons I didn't suggest that:
a) Well, actually it never occurred to me...
b) I thought that you might want to have this an "admin-only"
command, so nefarious users couldn't abuse it on a shared
system.
I'm certainly fine with it using "+t". Now it's just a matter
of figuring out how to implement it... :-)
--
Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@gilead.netel.rpi.edu
Senior Systems Programmer or gad@freebsd.org
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute or drosih@rpi.edu
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?p0600203dbbe4370a25f4>