Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2006 16:37:23 -0500 From: Tom Rhodes <trhodes@FreeBSD.org> To: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> Cc: perforce@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: PERFORCE change 91049 for review Message-ID: <20060204163723.63a536fc.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <200602041253.k14Crecf011086@repoman.freebsd.org> References: <200602041253.k14Crecf011086@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 4 Feb 2006 12:53:40 GMT Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > http://perforce.freebsd.org/chv.cgi?CH=91049 > > Change 91049 by rwatson@rwatson_peppercorn on 2006/02/04 12:53:12 > > When GC'ing a thread, assert that it has no active audit record. > This should not happen, but with this assert, brueffer and I would > not have spent 45 minutes trying to figure out why he wasn't > seeing audit records with the audit version in CVS. > Good catch! I had just booted the new CURRENT and was wondering about this. Thanks! -- Tom Rhodes
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060204163723.63a536fc.trhodes>