Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 15:12:28 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@cup.hp.com> Cc: Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: gcc and FreeBSD [was: Re: Which GCC in CURRENT? [Was: Re: Wine update]] Message-ID: <20001018151228.B71459@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <39ECB955.386D687A@cup.hp.com>; from marcel@cup.hp.com on Tue, Oct 17, 2000 at 04:40:53PM -0400 References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0010161257500.19548-100000@taygeta.dbai.tuwien.ac.at> <39ECB955.386D687A@cup.hp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Oct 17, 2000 at 04:40:53PM -0400, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
> > Should any of you have some time to spend, those two PRs I mentioned above
> > are really critical. <hint><hint> <g>
I have issues with one of them -- IMHO FSF/GCC should not assume the
existence of crt{i,n}.o since they supply their own crt{begin,end}.o
(thru crtstuff.c). There is obivious assumpitons by crtstuff.c on what
crt{i,n}.o supplies, and thus seems logical GCC come with its own
crt{i,n}.s. This is not to say I am unbending on this (and it also
carries over into JDP's teritory), but I do want to rasie this issue on
the gcc@gcc.gnu.org (after BSDcon) mailing list to see what they say.
> David: Can you take a look at it, or shall I try to free some time for
> this. It sounds important enough from what I understand from Gerald.
I am tied up at BSDcon for the week. So I'll reply to this thread better
later.
--
-- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001018151228.B71459>