Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 09:12:05 -0400 From: "Jonathan T. Looney" <jtl@freebsd.org> To: Michal Meloun <mmel@freebsd.org>, Nathan Whitehorn <nwhitehorn@freebsd.org>, Svatopluk Kraus <skra@freebsd.org>, "src-committers@freebsd.org" <src-committers@freebsd.org>, "svn-src-all@freebsd.org" <svn-src-all@freebsd.org>, "svn-src-head@freebsd.org" <svn-src-head@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r301453 - in head/sys: arm/arm arm64/arm64 dev/fdt dev/gpio dev/iicbus dev/ofw dev/pci dev/vnic kern mips/mips sys Message-ID: <6B1523CF-0456-45C7-AB09-057DBCEA2427@juniper.net> In-Reply-To: <57907B0F.9070204@FreeBSD.org> References: <201606051620.u55GKD5S066398@repo.freebsd.org> <b9606755-69cb-2cb0-04d7-6be32e4cb89e@freebsd.org> <578E0B5D.3070105@FreeBSD.org> <e026f6fc-76ed-5dbe-00fc-365b6d7bcf94@freebsd.org> <578F6075.7010500@FreeBSD.org> <05a80ac6-4285-ec9d-36e9-2f92c609f746@freebsd.org> <57907B0F.9070204@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 7/21/16, 3:34 AM, "owner-src-committers@freebsd.org on behalf of Michal Meloun" <owner-src-committers@freebsd.org on behalf of mmel@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > The API is part of still unstable, experimental INTRNG, so its not fixed we we can > change it at any time, I think. If INTRNG is unstable and experimental, why is it in the GENERIC kernel for arm64? Or, is the entire arm64 architecture considered unstable and experimental in 11.0? (I'm not trying to take sides; these are honest questions.) Jonathan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6B1523CF-0456-45C7-AB09-057DBCEA2427>