Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 20:40:38 -0800 From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> To: PseudoCylon <moonlightakkiy@yahoo.ca> Cc: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Subject: Re: negotiating HT params at assoc in sta mode Message-ID: <CAJ-Vmo=%2BJ_RqwcOw-e_nofAFKsUg3wxMpONqSwLnU-8BwMPsdA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAFZ_MYKWctMpOr-1=XYpi0YPDHn-xqOGr_48LS6ZU_X38Pzg2Q@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAFZ_MYJqKDRjWMZk%2BuA8ciLSi-W0U6_=gdV4FRKhz%2Bqb6o7qEw@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ-VmonO2Fh1ziVo25Z=BxNHoOzW73TF4LycbQk8ZjL6z=_G=g@mail.gmail.com> <CAFZ_MY%2BQQnG2HG9j8kQDGZbLZREuFB4u_RvBsD_o-sccijGFyg@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ-VmokXVtzWLHEA=k0Fps7cRYFu%2BA82zk0gt4Y=iZsUyF=Wzg@mail.gmail.com> <CAFZ_MY%2BrU7dqqQxhc8vey7iKuv%2BmmpFiVqb5cWmm%2BT20nNgX_g@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ-Vmok9%2B-m9PE3A8OLg8oW%2BmnrNztTMiO%2B4hxzxAXR=NCoR5g@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ-Vmo=fQF0C73yXzSL7FvBTt4140Skk6oy7t9e_w_ouf1j81Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAFZ_MYKWctMpOr-1=XYpi0YPDHn-xqOGr_48LS6ZU_X38Pzg2Q@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 20 February 2013 20:38, PseudoCylon <moonlightakkiy@yahoo.ca> wrote: >> Who can we rope in to review whether this is being done "right" ? > > Since it is ht param issue, anyone with 11n capable hardware with > working driver, or anyone with an AP which can tell Tx'd ampdu packets > are smaller than what the station has asked for. > > run(4) still generates lots of Rx errors. I cannot tell if the patch > does any good. I can only tell the AP does receive the driver defined > ht param, now. When doing aggregation? Try upping the ampdu density to something like 8 or 16 microseconds, maybe it needs more spacing between frames. What are you using as a transmitter in your run(4) tests? Thanks, Adrian
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-Vmo=%2BJ_RqwcOw-e_nofAFKsUg3wxMpONqSwLnU-8BwMPsdA>