Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2010 12:24:54 -0700 From: Chad Perrin <perrin@apotheon.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why do you use a devil as a mascot? Message-ID: <20101113192454.GF45252@guilt.hydra> In-Reply-To: <20101113163513.GD5441@michelle1> References: <12632_1289606734_4CDDD64E_12632_1397_1_D9B37353831173459FDAA836D3B43499A7AF8C5F@WADPMBXV0.waddell.com> <20101113002226.GI13998@comcast.net> <20101113163513.GD5441@michelle1>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--KJY2Ze80yH5MUxol Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 05:35:13PM +0100, Michelle Konzack wrote: > Hello Charlie Kester, >=20 > Am 2010-11-12 16:22:26, hacktest Du folgendes herunter: > > On Fri 12 Nov 2010 at 16:05:33 PST Gary Gatten wrote: > > >Let's start a thread listing dead horses to beat: > > > > > >M$ vs Novell > > >"Unix" vs "Linux" > > >Mainframe vs "PC" > > >DAS vs SAN > > >Top-posting vs Bottom posting > > >Blah blah blah vs Yada yada yada > >=20 > > OK, I'll play: > >=20 > > Gnome vs KDE > > Ports vs Packages (vs PBI's) > > GPL vs BSDL > > C vs any other programming language >=20 > Debian vs. FreeBSD. I'm shocked -- SHOCKED! -- that there still has not been any mention of vi vs. emacs in this list. --=20 Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ] --KJY2Ze80yH5MUxol Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkze5gYACgkQ9mn/Pj01uKXZRwCfUqMFSgOhVR0T+TRNJx0+sg2C G9kAnj49xX+WNUwqY6VRbrxQj+I6vVqY =QeL1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --KJY2Ze80yH5MUxol--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20101113192454.GF45252>