Date: Fri, 27 Jun 1997 11:00:34 +1000 (EST) From: "Daniel O'Callaghan" <danny@panda.hilink.com.au> To: Bernie Doehner <bad@uhf.wireless.net> Cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG, isp@FreeBSD.ORG, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ipfw: setsockopt failed Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.970627105934.869s-100000@panda.hilink.com.au> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.95.970626200931.701B-100000@uhf.wdc.net>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Thu, 26 Jun 1997, Bernie Doehner wrote: > > > > ipfw add divert 32000 ip from any to any via ed1 for example > > > > the system send me the message > > > > 00000 divert 32000 ip from any to any via ed1 > > ipfw: setsockopt(IP_FW_ADD): Invalid argument > > via is a legal keyword? Yes. Man ipfw. You can say 'ipfw ... in via ed0' 'ipfw ... out via ed0' 'ipfw ... via ed0' (in or out)home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.91.970627105934.869s-100000>