Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 14:50:55 +0200 From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> To: Jeff Roberson <jroberson@chesapeake.net> Cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/sys namei.h src/sys/kern vfs_syscalls.c Message-ID: <18260.1113396655@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 13 Apr 2005 08:16:32 EDT." <20050413081543.S28571@mail.chesapeake.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <20050413081543.S28571@mail.chesapeake.net>, Jeff Roberson writes: >On Wed, 13 Apr 2005, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > >> * Jeff Roberson <jroberson@chesapeake.net> [050412 23:22] wrote: >> > On Sat, 9 Apr 2005, Alfred Perlstein wrote: >> > >> > > Thank you very much. I'll update the docs when you're done. >> > >> > Don't you only need to know which calls are going to open, or do you also >> > need modifying ops like unlike and rename? >> >> Autofs does not support rename and unlink semantics were not as >> important as being able to differentiate between open(2) and stat(2). > >So would an ISOPEN flag work? We could do this rather than replace NOOBJ >in every syscall you don't care about. I'm trying to figure out if the >positive cases are fewer than the negative. ISOPEN gets my vote. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?18260.1113396655>