Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2012 09:14:01 -0700 From: Garrett Cooper <yanegomi@gmail.com> To: Anton Shterenlikht <mexas@bristol.ac.uk> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: openssl upgrade, libcrypto, libssl confusion Message-ID: <CAGH67wRvRpKPZ3mLJ31BHqBCAgbmw3NWh6Y4WfgFhx11KU0ViA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20120725120624.GA32934@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> References: <20120725113029.GA11089@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20120725120624.GA32934@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 5:06 AM, Anton Shterenlikht <mexas@bristol.ac.uk> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 12:30:29PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
>> In /usr/src/UPDATING I see
>>
>> 20120712:
>> The OpenSSL has been upgraded to 1.0.1c. Any binaries requiring
>> libcrypto.so.6 or libssl.so.6 must be recompiled. Also, there are
>> configuration changes. Make sure to merge /etc/ssl/openssl.cnf.
>
> oops.. wait a minute, I'm still on
>
> # uname -a
> FreeBSD mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk 10.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #6 r237134: Mon Jun 18 09:02:17 BST 2012 root@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/TZAV ia64
> #
>
> So this change shouldn't apply to me yet.
>
> Still there are *lots* of binaries, and libs
> linked with /lib/libcrypto.so.6:
>
> Binaries that are linked with: /lib/libcrypto.so.6
...
> and so on,
>
> so is it really right that I can safely delete it?
Some ldd/objdump and grep magic will give you the answer you need.
check-old-libs only points out candidates for removal based on
existence.
Cheers,
-Garrett
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAGH67wRvRpKPZ3mLJ31BHqBCAgbmw3NWh6Y4WfgFhx11KU0ViA>
