Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2006 10:21:07 +0200 From: Divacky Roman <xdivac02@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> To: Yuri Pankov <yuri.pankov@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-emulation <freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: amd64 module of linuxolator Message-ID: <20060617082107.GA84082@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> In-Reply-To: <1150406643.1475.18.camel@klamath.irbis.net.ru> References: <1150272035.1475.3.camel@klamath.irbis.net.ru> <20060615094739.hqtxz7jadcw0cg0o@netchild.homeip.net> <1150365953.1475.12.camel@klamath.irbis.net.ru> <61903339@bs2.sp34.ru> <1150406643.1475.18.camel@klamath.irbis.net.ru>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 01:24:03AM +0400, Yuri Pankov wrote: > On Fri, 2006-06-16 at 00:13 +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote: > > On Thu, 15 Jun 2006 14:05:53 +0400 Yuri Pankov wrote: > > > > > Actually, i wasn't able to test it, cause the only port i use - > > > linux-ePSXe - doesn't run without linprocfs and it's not available as > > > module now. > > > > Linprocfs is available to auto/manual mounting after installing > > default linux base port. Linux_base-fc4 is preferred now as it may > > become a default linux base port soon. Pay attention on the messages > > after installing the port. > > > > > > WBR > > I do pay attention to the messages when installing the fc-4 port, but > there's no linprocfs.ko with the patch provided by Roman, so I'm unable > to kldload it.. looking at the linprocfs/Makefile I dont see any reason why it shouldnt build on amd64, you try by "cd /sys/modules/linprocfs && make". I dont have amd64 atm and I want to focus on UNIMPL && messages + TLS now... anyway - the linprocfs and linuxolator are separate issues. do you guys think that the amd64 modul is "ok enough" to be commited? romanhome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060617082107.GA84082>