Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 21 May 2000 22:58:57 -0600
From:      Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org>
To:        Warner Losh <imp@village.org>, cjclark@home.com
Cc:        freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: The procfs Hole in 2.2.8-STABLE? 
Message-ID:  <4.3.1.2.20000521225733.048a0c40@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <200005220437.WAA92094@harmony.village.org>
References:  <Your message of "Sun, 21 May 2000 14:08:47 EDT." <20000521140847.G96573@cc942873-a.ewndsr1.nj.home.com> <20000521140847.G96573@cc942873-a.ewndsr1.nj.home.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hopefully, some of the things that are being fixed in 4.0 will
be backported to 3.5. We want 3.5 to be the "golden" release that
we use for production until 4.2 is ready and stable.

--Brett

At 10:37 PM 5/21/2000, Warner Losh wrote:
   
>In message <20000521140847.G96573@cc942873-a.ewndsr1.nj.home.com> "Crist J. Clark" writes:
>: Am I to take it that 2.2.8-STABLE would be vulnerable? The following
>
>Yes.  There are many vulnerabilities that were fixed in 3.x that
>haven't been back ported to 2.x.
>
>Warner
>
>
>To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
>with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4.3.1.2.20000521225733.048a0c40>