Date: Thu, 19 Aug 1999 20:13:24 -0400 (EDT) From: Alfred Perlstein <bright@rush.net> To: "Alton, Matthew" <Matthew.Alton@anheuser-busch.com> Cc: "'Russell Cattelan'" <cattelan@thebarn.com>, "'fs@FreeBSD.ORG'" <fs@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: RE: BSD-XFS Update Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.990819201232.20420P-100000@cygnus.rush.net> In-Reply-To: <0740CBD1D149D31193EB0008C7C56836EB8B15@STLABCEXG012>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 19 Aug 1999, Alton, Matthew wrote: > Pinned in the AIX-style "pinned memory" sense? Succinctly, AIX > allows userland programs to tag memory pages so as to guarantee that > they will not be swapped to backing store. Portions of the _KERNEL_ > are paged out instead if necessary. > > I assume that the pinning is of the AIX sort and that it is desirable, if > not necessary, for the realtime throughput guarantee policy. Nes pas? man mlock -Alfred To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-fs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.990819201232.20420P-100000>