Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 20:13:22 +0100 From: Torfinn Ingolfsen <torfinn.ingolfsen@broadpark.no> To: freebsd-usb@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: SANE vs USB scanner on 8.0 Message-ID: <20100124201322.db57787b.torfinn.ingolfsen@broadpark.no> In-Reply-To: <201001240939.22895.hselasky@c2i.net> References: <200909282240.53802.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> <20100110184252.a2efd4cd.torfinn.ingolfsen@broadpark.no> <20100124031045.ad6515c9.torfinn.ingolfsen@broadpark.no> <201001240939.22895.hselasky@c2i.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 24 Jan 2010 09:39:22 +0100 Hans Petter Selasky <hselasky@c2i.net> wrote: > It was removed and replaced by libusb. Ok. > Report a bug report to the sane-backend > developers, so that they get aware about the problem. I am not sure that the bug is with SANE and the snapscan backend, and not in our libusb? Anyway, I have posted a message[1] to the sane-devel mailing list, we will see if that helps. References: 1) http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/sane-devel/2010-January/025968.html -- Regards, Torfinn Ingolfsen
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100124201322.db57787b.torfinn.ingolfsen>