Date: Fri, 30 Jul 1999 17:06:28 +0100 From: Nik Clayton <nik@nothing-going-on.demon.co.uk> To: "Stephen J. Roznowski" <sjr@home.net> Cc: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Suggested enhancement to y2kbug.sgml page Message-ID: <19990730170628.A71507@kilt.nothing-going-on.org> In-Reply-To: <199906030151.VAA12813@istari.home.net>; from Stephen J. Roznowski on Wed, Jun 02, 1999 at 09:51:48PM -0400 References: <199906030151.VAA12813@istari.home.net>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
Stephen,
Sorry it's taken this long to get back to you;
On Wed, Jun 02, 1999 at 09:51:48PM -0400, Stephen J. Roznowski wrote:
> I've been looking at adding the following section to the Y2K bug web page
> (patch below). Basically, this adds a letter in front of each problem
> report, and creates a little table showing compliance.
>
> However, after doing this, it doesn't seem like it would be very useful
> (since most of the problems weren't fixed until the most recent releases).
> Also, I was unsure of where -STABLE releases fit in this timeline.
As you say, I don't think it's too useful, and it becomes just one more
thing to maintain, which is probably a bad thing. So, unless you were
volunteering to maintain it as well it's probably best to drop it.
Thanks for the effort though,
N
--
[intentional self-reference] can be easily accommodated using a blessed,
non-self-referential dummy head-node whose own object destructor severs
the links.
-- Tom Christiansen in <375143b5@cs.colorado.edu>
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message
help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990730170628.A71507>