Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2025 10:15:33 +0200 From: Harald Eilertsen <haraldei@anduin.net> To: Ronald Klop <ronald-lists@klop.ws> Cc: java@freebsd.org Subject: Re: openjdk build failures on "nm" Message-ID: <mxss65u22c5oy4gvokvpc472yospz5mtyv7aionej5qgq7ycx2@jpxajffsomeh> In-Reply-To: <2053927433.1876.1757575928041@localhost> References: <1221594030.658.1756976173189@localhost> <wy6tjmjqq3temf3smm7vbohvxd5hvvaplrycx66zmfffkwg4sn@2lfjlx3fp7xr> <1330428831.1750.1756980558066@localhost> <efoy4e5mqaa5xen277swrpj3w2mgthmkxza5p3k3hbxfpc7hn5@joytibqygluz> <2053927433.1876.1757575928041@localhost>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Thu, Sep 11, 2025 at 09:32:08AM +0200, Ronald Klop wrote: > As it seems hard to debug, what do the java@ maintainers think of this experiment? > > diff --git a/java/openjdk17/Makefile b/java/openjdk17/Makefile > index 5cb25e6aee72..ba7001ff2bd0 100644 > --- a/java/openjdk17/Makefile > +++ b/java/openjdk17/Makefile > @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ GH_PROJECT= jdk17u > > NO_CCACHE= yes > > -_MAKE_JOBS= # > +MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE= yes > MAKE_ENV= LANG="C" \ > LC_ALL="C" \ > CLASSPATH="" \ That's well spotted! I think this is definitely worth trying. I'm no expert on the ports Makefiles myself, but was told to use MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE instead in the review for openjdk24. Haven't gone through all the ancient version yet, as my focus is mainly on mainline, and these days on openjdk25. > I can commit this today to openjdk17 and if builds start to succeed to other openjdk* ports. I'm in favour! H!help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?mxss65u22c5oy4gvokvpc472yospz5mtyv7aionej5qgq7ycx2>