Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 19:14:28 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: so much clock interrupts?! Message-ID: <20051125001428.GA32821@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20051125010852.V86615@chylonia.3miasto.net> References: <20051124013438.T8326@chylonia.3miasto.net> <20051124023928.GA13075@xor.obsecurity.org> <20051124140503.A75939@chylonia.3miasto.net> <20051124195930.GA19106@xor.obsecurity.org> <20051125010852.V86615@chylonia.3miasto.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--TB36FDmn/VVEgNH/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 01:09:08AM +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote: > >>>No, it's just a consequence of HZ=3D1000 instead of HZ=3D100. I've > >> > >> > >>so why 2000 not 1000? > >> > >>2000 on each processor! > > > >Technical reasons..anyway, 2000 might look like a large number to you, > >but it's really not unless you're on a very slow machine (like a 486). >=20 > i'm asking why it's 2000, not 1000. I don't remember off-hand. It should be apparent if you look at the code. Kris --TB36FDmn/VVEgNH/ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDhldjWry0BWjoQKURArkwAJ97C7mW3yhnuhRS0q9orcNKl3KbGACg/i51 kIwFwVNYQ9ta54QZ6g/SQo8= =L9EG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --TB36FDmn/VVEgNH/--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051125001428.GA32821>