Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 17:58:22 -0600 (CST) From: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> To: David O'Brien <obrien@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Oliver Eikemeier <eik@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/lang/egcs/files patch-cp%decl.cpatch-cp%ptree.c patch-cp::decl.c patch-cp::ptree.c patch-libiberty%Makefile.in patch-libiberty::Makefile.in ports/mail/exim-old/files patch-src%s Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0402181754320.29255-100000@pancho> In-Reply-To: <20040218231949.GB61242@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Want to see Bash imported?? if that's what it takes to stop the "::". I'm sorry, but I don't see the tone of this comment as being consistent with the "developer relations" section of the handbook. Bikesheds about filename separators are one thing; bikesheds about duelling shell imports are quite another. The former might or might not produce a working consensus; the latter is completely doomed from the outset. Please, let's keep this to the filename-separator problem. My own personal opinion? Unless we want to thrash the CVS repository really, really, hard, and force a lot of people to upgrade ports because of portrevision bumps, we ought to let this sleeping dog lie. But I'm not in a position to make policy on the issue, and other people's mileage may vary. mcl
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.4.44.0402181754320.29255-100000>