Date: Sat, 28 May 2022 07:52:11 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 237290] [PATCH] build(7): PORTS_MODULES does not build in parallel Message-ID: <bug-237290-227-n6fu1xUbFx@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-237290-227@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=237290 Tatsuki Makino <tatsuki_makino@hotmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tatsuki_makino@hotmail.com --- Comment #12 from Tatsuki Makino <tatsuki_makino@hotmail.com> --- If the -B of make -B is only to prevent parallel execution, I think it is excessive. For example, the value of .MAKE.MODE changes from normal to compat. Just make -- and make -j 1 also makes a difference. Options like -J 15,16 come across in the MAKEFLAGS environment variable. Wouldn't it be better to pass MAKEFLAGS with the -[Jj] option dropped in the environment variable? MAKEFLAGS="${MAKEFLAGS:M*:C/((^| )-[Jjm]) /\1/gW:N-[Jjm]*:NMK_AUTO_OBJ=*}" The number of jobs when building ports is left to MAKE_JOBS_NUMBER on the ports side. If make buildkernel is executed with -j 1, but MAKE_JOBS_NUMBER is 4, then build the port with 4 jobs. (In reply to Ivan Rozhuk from comment #11) :M*@*:C/.*@/FLAVOR=/g is great :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-237290-227-n6fu1xUbFx>