Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 07:39:41 -0400 (EDT) From: Mikhail Teterin <mi@aldan.algebra.com> To: dillon@earth.backplane.com Cc: root@aldan.algebra.com, brian@Awfulhak.org, ache@nagual.pp.ru, kuriyama@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, brian@freebsd-services.com Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc/defaults rc.conf src/etc/mtree BSD.var.dist src/etc/namedb named.conf Message-ID: <200108241139.f7OBdiW83814@aldan.algebra.com> In-Reply-To: <200108240053.f7O0rFF91533@earth.backplane.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 23 Aug, Matt Dillon wrote: > :I was only talking about the sandbox itself -- what's now in > :/etc/namedb/s -- what named has to be able to rewrite... Cached > :zones... > > The sandbox is /etc/namedb, not /etc/namedb/s. If you chroot, then > you have no choice in regards to where the secondaries go. Chroot is not in question. The existing sample configuration, suggests the ``/etc/namedb/s'' as the place for cached zones. I think, that should be replaced with /var/db/named (or /var/db/dns). Outright chroot-ing is a different story and is unnecessary if named runs as bind:bind... I guess, the term ``sandbox'' is confusing... -mi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200108241139.f7OBdiW83814>