Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 18:53:11 +0800 From: Cheng-Lung Sung <clsung@FreeBSD.org> To: Michael Landin Hostbaek <mich@FreeBSD.org>, Cheng-Lung Sung <clsung@FreeBSD.org>, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, kde@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/audio/libtunepimp Makefile distinfo pkg-plist ports/audio/libtunepimp/files patch-configure Message-ID: <20060728105311.GA19313@FreeBSD.csie.nctu.edu.tw> In-Reply-To: <20060728092754.GB54145@mich2.itxmarket.com> References: <200607231405.k6NE5ewh013386@repoman.freebsd.org> <20060727091217.GN82058@mich2.itxmarket.com> <20060727093200.GA14150@FreeBSD.csie.nctu.edu.tw> <20060727093938.GV82058@mich2.itxmarket.com> <20060728025304.GA92930@FreeBSD.csie.nctu.edu.tw> <20060728092754.GB54145@mich2.itxmarket.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --]
On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 11:27:54AM +0200, Michael Landin Hostbaek wrote:
> Cheng-Lung Sung (clsung) writes:
> > Will they (juk/amarok) have updates in few days?
>
> I doubt it. The 0.3 to 0.4 took a looooong time to be supported..
>
> > Or just set them BROKEN for a while?
>
> I don't think it is a good solution. If I remember correctly only a few
> ports uses the tunepimp lib, it would be silly to mark them as BROKEN,
> just to have 0.5 in the tree..
> Alternatively I could rip out musicbrainz support of amarok.. I don't
> know what the juk maintainer is planning to do.. (kde@ cc'ed)
Then, how about repocopy for libtunepimp-4?
--
Cheng-Lung Sung - clsung@
[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFEyeyW+AeJ85Vui8ERAv3IAJ9J+JOTz0Rg1E/Ln4zMY7k8cpTIdACfR+NW
1k9Gdx1ByvNmCJ3VeKDBznU=
=18lc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060728105311.GA19313>