Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 22:32:57 -0700 From: Garrett Cooper <yanegomi@gmail.com> To: Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org> Cc: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>, Current FreeBSD <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, "O. Hartmann" <ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de>, freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Intel XEON Phi: Linux only? Message-ID: <CAGH67wQXs0tKoVYebREEVb-a9cUb6WW2ruCHSXYxy2ZCv7UkGg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <E7D09E4B-293F-4317-9F6B-62C0D0174C3C@samsco.org> References: <4FE0D080.6020802@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <CAJ-VmonNO1vAvyvpMk_eYTFRf0aHKADjg8fB32_by2G8ZpfgAQ@mail.gmail.com> <E7D09E4B-293F-4317-9F6B-62C0D0174C3C@samsco.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 8:51 PM, Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org> wrote:
> On Jun 19, 2012, at 4:31 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>
>> I bet the answer is something like "Get FreeBSD up on it or work with
>> someone who can help you do that."
>>
>> It's a catch-22 just like GPU - unless ${COMPANY} has customers using
>> it, they're not likely to dedicate resources, and no users will use it
>> if it doesn't work, so .. who will break the cycle. :)
>
> If I may be blunt here, there's no point in idle speculation when there a=
re several FreeBSD committers who work for Intel and write Intel drivers fo=
r FreeBSD. =A0Let's ask them!
+1!
-Garrett
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAGH67wQXs0tKoVYebREEVb-a9cUb6WW2ruCHSXYxy2ZCv7UkGg>