Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 14:40:28 -0300 From: Fernando Schapachnik <fschapachnik@vianetworks.com.ar> To: Fernando Germano <fgermano@audiotel.com.ar> Cc: security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Best security topology for FreeBSD Message-ID: <20011121144028.B27934@ns1.via-net-works.net.ar> In-Reply-To: <00d201c172af$a96227b0$ed64a8c0@audi2k>; from fgermano@audiotel.com.ar on Wed, Nov 21, 2001 at 02:12:12PM -0300 References: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0111211653410.8343-100000@pkl.net> <00d201c172af$a96227b0$ed64a8c0@audi2k>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
En un mensaje anterior, Fernando Germano escribió: > > We'll, the answer is simple: money, we don't use something like PIX because > it's way too expensive for something like this. > > I'm worried about NAT, will FreeBSD and IpFilter be able to NAT all of this > traffic?? I've used IP Filter in a couple of heavy-loaded scenarios and never had a problem (also, machine load was almost allways at 0). Good luck. Fernando P. Schapachnik Gerente de tecnología de red y sistemas de información VIA NET.WORKS ARGENTINA S.A. fschapachnik@vianetworks.com.ar Tel.: (54-11) 4323-3381 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011121144028.B27934>