Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2017 15:13:23 +0300 From: Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw@zxy.spb.ru> To: Brooks Davis <brooks@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, freebsd-atm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: The fate of ngatm Message-ID: <20170428121323.GF83631@zxy.spb.ru> In-Reply-To: <20170427180029.GB35387@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net> References: <20170427180029.GB35387@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 06:00:29PM +0000, Brooks Davis wrote: > As previous threatened, I've removed support for NATM (as well as a > remarkable number of remnants of the old ATM framework). One piece > that still remains is the ngatm framework in netgraph. This includes > the ng_ccatm(4), ng_sscfu(4), ng_sscop(4), and ng_uni(4) nodes. > > These don't attach to physical interfaces and didn't depend on the NATM > interface code so I left them alone in the first cut. My question > is, are they useful without physical interfaces? If so, keeping them > doesn't appear to have a high support burden. If not, we should remove > them. may be it can be used together w/ USB ADSL modem? Not sure about suported and existeing modern ADSL USB modem.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20170428121323.GF83631>