Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2014 17:40:10 +0200 (CEST) From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Trond_Endrest=F8l?= <Trond.Endrestol@fagskolen.gjovik.no> To: Harald Schmalzbauer <h.schmalzbauer@omnilan.de> Cc: meyser@xenet.de, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Michelle Sullivan <michelle@sorbs.net> Subject: Re: How to submit new Ports Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.11.1408071738490.64214@mail.fig.ol.no> In-Reply-To: <53E39CEE.9040507@omnilan.de> References: <53E2040F.1000000@xenet.de> <53E209D3.8040400@my.hennepintech.edu> <53E2111F.7030604@sorbs.net> <53E39CEE.9040507@omnilan.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 7 Aug 2014 17:36+0200, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: > Bezüglich Michelle Sullivan's Nachricht vom 06.08.2014 13:27 (localtime): > > ? > >>> P.S. I don`t want to create an bugzilla account. > >>> > >> ? > > Further all you need to do is set a password.. and as Koobs said, > > reports are a higher quality. Personally I started submitting pr's just > > before the change to bugzilla, and I find the bugzilla: > > > > 1/ Easier to report (click the right buttons, add a subject, add a > > patch/attachment, submit) > > 2/ Easier to reply/update - you can add comments new attachments at any > > time without any hassle > > 3/ You get faster responses from the admins/commiters/testers. > > > > All in all personally I think the move to bugzilla was a good move for all. > > Unfortunately I can't share your experience. > Any time I log in, having my e-mail address auto-filled into 'requester' > and 'requestee', result is -> "No requests." > Which isn't true of course. I have to search for "samba41" e.g., to find > my own submission. > > The response time is in no way related to the kind of bug tracking > system, at least not if it's about gnats vs. bugzilla. In my example > case, response or any other form of activity is lagging more than what I > was used to with gnats. > > My personal experience is, that in the last decade, not much has > changed, since I found bugzilla to be one of the most inconvenient bug > tracking systems out there in the early/mid 2000s (when my choice for > various projects over decent time was "doublechocolate" :-) > > 'send-pr' encouraged/admonished/forced admins to deploy sensible > mailhubs (internal DNS RRs) and gateway-masquerading. I've never seen > that beeing wasted effort ? it's always been beneficial for the whole > infratructure and the admins' skills :-) > > If you once read send-pr and submitted your first PR, it was easy and > clear how to fill out subsequent PRs. In my opinion, much more clearly > than with bugzilla, where I have to rethink all the bells and whistles > each time > (btw, what does 'triage' mean?!?). Another word for sorting. Triage is typically a medical word, sorting the wounded. > I haven't had to look into bug tracking systems for some years, but > since I was now urged to deal with bugzilla, I fear this choice was one > of the quick ones. > > But maybe the developers profit from the change. > > Regards, > > -Harry -- +-------------------------------+------------------------------------+ | Vennlig hilsen, | Best regards, | | Trond Endrestøl, | Trond Endrestøl, | | IT-ansvarlig, | System administrator, | | Fagskolen Innlandet, | Gjøvik Technical College, Norway, | | tlf. mob. 952 62 567, | Cellular...: +47 952 62 567, | | sentralbord 61 14 54 00. | Switchboard: +47 61 14 54 00. | +-------------------------------+------------------------------------+ From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 7 15:54:30 2014 Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG> Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 92571A0A for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Thu, 7 Aug 2014 15:54:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "wonkity.com", Issuer "wonkity.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 429C72FF3 for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Thu, 7 Aug 2014 15:54:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s77FsQj5013325 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 7 Aug 2014 09:54:26 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) with ESMTP id s77FsQQl013322; Thu, 7 Aug 2014 09:54:26 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2014 09:54:26 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com> To: Zoran Kolic <zkolic@sbb.rs> Subject: Re: xorg problem In-Reply-To: <20140807152738.GA1076@mycenae.sbb.rs> Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.11.1408070952050.88863@wonkity.com> References: <20140807152738.GA1076@mycenae.sbb.rs> User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (BSF 23 2013-08-11) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Thu, 07 Aug 2014 09:54:26 -0600 (MDT) Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org> List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-stable>, <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/>; List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>, <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2014 15:54:30 -0000 On Thu, 7 Aug 2014, Zoran Kolic wrote: > Problem again. I upgraded to 9.3 and upgraded > packages using pkg upgrade -f. All went fine, > except I cannot run X. > Here is the log: > > _XSERVTransSocketOpenCOTSServer: Unable to open socket for inet6 > _XSERVTransOpen: transport open failed for inet6/system:0 > _XSERVTransMakeAllCOTSServerListeners: failed to open listener for inet6 > > X.Org X Server 1.7.7 There is a separate repository for the newer Xorg. See http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-announce/2014-July/001570.html
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.11.1408071738490.64214>