Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2001 19:48:10 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Ade Lovett <ade@FreeBSD.org> Cc: "Chad R. Larson" <chad@DCFinc.com>, kris@obsecurity.org, stable@FreeBSD.org, qa@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: New TCP Initial Sequence number code Message-ID: <20010419194810.B58378@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20010419191301.X76500@FreeBSD.org>; from ade@FreeBSD.org on Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 07:13:01PM -0500 References: <20010418210948.N76500@FreeBSD.org> <200104192342.QAA08604@freeway.dcfinc.com> <20010419191301.X76500@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--eJnRUKwClWJh1Khz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 07:13:01PM -0500, Ade Lovett wrote: > On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 04:42:05PM -0700, Chad R. Larson wrote: > > As I recall, Ade Lovett wrote: > > > We can easily pump "a shitload" of data through it. > >=20 > > Is that one of those technical terms? >=20 > Yeah. Roughly equating to 2000 parallel streams between two boxes, > one before the patch, and one after, maxing out at PCI bus with > gig-E cards back-to-back into /dev/null. >=20 > No problems that I can see. Both machines performed flawlessly, > and are now taking a breather by the pool until I put them (or boxes > like them) into active service. Thanks for testing this, it was an extremely valuable confirmation! Kris --eJnRUKwClWJh1Khz Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE636NpWry0BWjoQKURAmGlAJ9bKC9SwOtgc/Df6ZT82kMlVX/YgwCff1A4 9qKqhMSeIqGZK/PWiQHQjNY= =zhhs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --eJnRUKwClWJh1Khz-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-qa" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010419194810.B58378>