Date: Sat, 08 Apr 2000 17:31:40 +0200 From: Roelof Osinga <roelof@nisser.com> To: "Pedro F. Giffuni" <giffunip@asme.org> Cc: Gustavo V G C Rios <kernel@lince.tdnet.com.br>, freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Is traditional unixes kernel really stable ? Message-ID: <38EF50DC.D5EE3EAF@nisser.com> References: <38ED128C.22C3AA28@tdnet.com.br> <20000406192206.N22104@fw.wintelcom.net> <38ED233E.74716D02@tdnet.com.br> <20000406230234.B4381@fw.wintelcom.net> <38EDD209.421EF9B0@tdnet.com.br> <38EE0536.F2305A40@quack.kfu.com> <38EDDBC4.51F2414D@tdnet.com.br> <38EE49A9.FD59F18@asme.org> <38EE6578.B27A1B27@nisser.com> <38EEABF5.9F05176@asme.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Pedro F. Giffuni" wrote: > > Anyway, I read somewhere that many Apple engineers were happier with a > monolitic kernel, (specificly FreeBSD) but the higher levels simply > wanted Mach. We will be able to make nice comparisons when we have a > FreeBSD port for the PowerPC... Can imagine, known territory. E.g. the Hurd was/is, at least to me, quite, well, different. Don't suppose that'll be a really fair comparison. Message passing doesn't come cheap. Roelof -- Home is where the (@) http://eboa.com/ is. UPC/Chello home http://nisser.com/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?38EF50DC.D5EE3EAF>