Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2002 17:40:24 -0700 From: Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net> To: Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net> Cc: net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: adding if_printf() Message-ID: <20020906174024.A32666@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu> In-Reply-To: <20020815133314.A5037@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu>; from brooks@one-eyed-alien.net on Thu, Aug 15, 2002 at 01:33:14PM -0700 References: <20020815133314.A5037@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Thu, Aug 15, 2002 at 01:33:14PM -0700, Brooks Davis wrote: > I propose we create a new function if_printf() which is just like > device_printf() except that it takes a (struct ifnet *) instead of a > device_t. It prints things like: > > an0: message > > Since this is what the vast majority of printfs in interface code, using > this function would be cleaner and easier. Additionaly, it potentialy > gives driver authors a say to keep their source more compatable between > 4.x and 5.x after the if_xname conversion. Does anyone violently oppose this function? I think it's the best way to keep the move to if_xname sane. I'd like to commit it soon and start converting drivers. -- Brooks -- Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE. PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529 9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4 [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE9eUr2XY6L6fI4GtQRAlyaAJ9tvmJeeP5Dvdm4ZR62VBt0vcbhCQCg4XYf hU0IBoDr5He1axBew6n13/4= =gJ5i -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020906174024.A32666>