Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 11:54:43 +0200 From: Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net> To: John Reynolds <johnjen@reynoldsnet.org> Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CALL FOR TESTERS: new candidate for libusb port Message-ID: <20050228095443.GF10869@straylight.m.ringlet.net> In-Reply-To: <20050228095047.GE10869@straylight.m.ringlet.net> References: <16929.3285.129783.696868@whale.home-net> <20050228095047.GE10869@straylight.m.ringlet.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 11:50:47AM +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote: > On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 04:57:09PM -0700, John Reynolds wrote: > > Hello all, I know that I have been veeeeeeeeery slow in arriving at this > > point. My life has been sucked away recently with a large project at work. Such > > is "open source" .... > > > > But at long last I have devoted some cycles to updating the libusb port for > > FreeBSD. However, since there has been such a long cycle between updates, and > > many changes to the code I wanted to roll a binary package file and have people > > test out with existing apps before I submitted the PR to have the port files > > themselves changed. > > > > The version in the tree right now is 0.1.7. Johannes has released 0.1.10a just > > a few weeks ago and it looks like it has many changes to the BSD code (with > > what looks like some the integration of some patches which previously were > > applied by the port itself). > > > > So, for those who enjoy libusb on a daily basis like me, can you please fetch > > the following: > > > > http://www.reynoldsnet.org/libusb-0.1.10a.tbz > > Wouldn't it be better if you provided a patch to the port as well, so > people can build it on other releases of FreeBSD, e.g. 4.x? :) Errr... this may have come out a bit too curt. Thanks for your interest in the libusb port, and thanks for doing the work on it! Still... how about also providing a patch? :) G'luck, Peter -- Peter Pentchev roam@ringlet.net roam@cnsys.bg roam@FreeBSD.org PGP key: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc Key fingerprint FDBA FD79 C26F 3C51 C95E DF9E ED18 B68D 1619 4553 This sentence claims to be an Epimenides paradox, but it is lying. [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCIupj7Ri2jRYZRVMRAkdVAJ0emtNytzBI9Egm6LTm981b0XkLTACgtBj7 scTIt41M1ylLfPCO0IKNmD0= =fV3F -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050228095443.GF10869>