Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 21 Apr 2003 16:51:11 +0200
From:      Wilko Bulte <wkb@freebie.xs4all.nl>
To:        Jake Burkholder <jake@locore.ca>
Cc:        alpha@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: ipfw(2) vs alpha
Message-ID:  <20030421145111.GC279@freebie.xs4all.nl>
In-Reply-To: <20030421141847.GD50754@locore.ca>
References:  <20030421141847.GD50754@locore.ca>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On Mon, Apr 21, 2003 at 10:18:47AM -0400, Jake Burkholder wrote:
> 
> Is anyone using ipfw2 in -current on an alpha?  It has all kinds of
> problems on sparc64 due to not respecting strict alignment constraints,
> which should affect alpha as well; things like ipfw list cause alignment
> faults with certain rule types.  Anyone seeing this?

Yes, see the mailing list on -alpha and
Message-ID: <Pine.HPX.4.33.0304092208130.3140-100000@rzsrv1.rz.tu-bs.de>

I could not reproduce it here on my AS500, but I think you are seeing the
same thing on sparc64.

-- 
|   / o / /_  _   		wilko@freebie.xs4all.nl
|/|/ / / /(  (_)  Bulte				



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030421145111.GC279>