Date: Sat, 03 Jan 2026 23:13:36 +0100 From: Evilham <contact@evilham.com> To: freebsd-git@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Comparison with other Forges | Forgejo Message-ID: <15c2814ee6d27c6f0aeccb617807b2c04549@yggdrasil.evilham.com> In-Reply-To: <cde84ee1-1569-45a7-990f-b126ed7e7645@gmail.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On ds., gen. 03 2026, Graham Perrin wrote: > To complement the git-specific threads that are not yet in > freebsd-git@ > > <https://forgejo.org/compare/>; FWIW (and risking repetition if these points already came out elsewhere than freebsd-git), I run a few instances of Forgejo, a couple of them on FreeBSD, which were migrations off phabricator. After talking to some Forgejo devs (some of which happen to be very close to Codeberg.org ops), it is clear that they have good plans when it comes to UX, are very community-focused and also that it is an upstream that is very open to having official support in Forgejo (aka: providing pre-built binaries), given that we are able to do the work to run the test suite automatically. A couple years ago that was a tad more difficult, but now that FreeBSD can run as an OCI, maybe this is relatively simple achieve. Having this kind of first-level support for FreeBSD in Forgejo would be great. Cheers, and lovely pick of forge. -- Evilhamhome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?15c2814ee6d27c6f0aeccb617807b2c04549>