Date: Mon, 24 Apr 1995 09:04:18 +0200 (MET DST) From: J Wunsch <j@jette.heep.sax.de> To: hackers@FreeBSD.org Cc: Andrew.Gordon@net-tel.co.uk Subject: Re: Re(2): IP problem with 950412-SNAP (and earlier -SNAPs) Message-ID: <199504240704.JAA03513@jette.heep.sax.de> In-Reply-To: <199504240051.TAA16133@bonkers.taronga.com> from "Peter da Silva" at Apr 23, 95 07:51:07 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > > or else the kernel restriction on routing to the local > > interface address needs to be relaxed (but what if you have multiple > > point-to-point links sharing the same address). > > How could you do that? Each interface needs to have a unique address. > With the exception that only the remote side of point-to-point links is meaningful for this restriction. You can easily share the local address for 20 plugged-in SLIP or PPP connections. Jörg
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199504240704.JAA03513>