Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2011 11:01:53 -0800 From: Matthew Jacob <mj@feral.com> To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Linux kernel compatability Message-ID: <4D236EA1.8000101@feral.com> In-Reply-To: <201101041144.26815.jhb@freebsd.org> References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1101031017110.1450@desktop> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1101031859290.1450@desktop> <20110104082252.45bb5e7f@kan.dnsalias.net> <201101041144.26815.jhb@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 1/4/2011 8:44 AM, John Baldwin wrote: > > Actually, there are three different companies funding the IB port because > there are in fact multiple users of IB on FreeBSD. It seems silly to have > three+ different versions of the IB stack maintained separately rather than > pooling developer resources across multiple FreeBSD consumers to amortize the > future maintenance costs. > Hear, Hear! To a certain degree these three companies are competitors, but in the case of having a working IB stack, it benefits us all to have a common one.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4D236EA1.8000101>