Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 4 Feb 1997 21:28:46 +0100
From:      j@uriah.heep.sax.de (J Wunsch)
To:        msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au (Michael Smith)
Cc:        current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: 2.2 fails to build?
Message-ID:  <Mutt.19970204212846.j@uriah.heep.sax.de>
In-Reply-To: <199702040730.SAA11726@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au>; from Michael Smith on Feb 4, 1997 18:00:50 %2B1030
References:  <199702040730.SAA11726@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As Michael Smith wrote:

> Hrmm.  I'm having trouble building 2.2 after Satoshi merged the new gdb :

As i wrote in the commit message, i didn't have a suitable 2.2 test
compilation platform over there in California.  There were only
freefall (2.1.6.1, and short of CPU cycles anyway) and thud
(3.0-current).  However, it required cvs tagging the files into 2.2 in
order to be checked out in the 2.2 branch at all.  I've test-compiled
on thud, and it worked there (except of the texinfo stuff).

I'm just heating my 2.2 scratchbox, and will CVS update the gdb there.
But it's a 386/40, so i wouldn't expect any results before tomorrow.
:-)

-- 
cheers, J"org

joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Mutt.19970204212846.j>