Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 00:51:49 -0800 From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" <tedm@toybox.placo.com> To: "Steven H. Baeighkley" <stevenb@frii.com>, <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: **questions** Re: serious performance problems with 6.2 Release Message-ID: <000601c751a7$b330b310$3c01a8c0@coolf89ea26645> References: <45D3A4D7.9000504@frii.com><00ff01c7510e$7452e490$3c01a8c0@coolf89ea26645> <eeef1a4c0702150849q76fa6a4cke5e88477189be093@mail.gmail.com><012a01c75128$4d3a5a40$3c01a8c0@coolf89ea26645> <45D49D5A.8070800@frii.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
----- Original Message ----- From: "Steven H. Baeighkley" <stevenb@frii.com> To: <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2007 9:50 AM Subject: Re: **questions** Re: serious performance problems with 6.2 Release > If bugs is the correct list then that's where we'll send it. However we > were not initially thinking it was a bug. We were thinking it was a > configuration error on our part. We certainly weren't expecting kernel > patches, just advice on where next to proceed. Thanks for the send-pr > suggestion. We have verbose dmesg logs for all of our testing, I didn't > want to send them initially because they are large and we have 12 of them. > If you have 4 CPU's and FreeBSD is only seeing 2 of them then I'd say it's a bug! You can always post a link to where the logs are. Ted
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?000601c751a7$b330b310$3c01a8c0>