Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 22:24:31 +0300 From: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org> To: Cyrille Lefevre <clefevre-lists@9online.fr> Cc: current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: bin/41071: make NO to NO_ transition patch Message-ID: <20040416192431.GC1584@ip.net.ua> In-Reply-To: <022901c423cb$03f493b0$7890a8c0@dyndns.org> References: <00f401c4232b$8700d0c0$7890a8c0@dyndns.org> <20040416115549.P11609@gamplex.bde.org> <022901c423cb$03f493b0$7890a8c0@dyndns.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Fri, Apr 16, 2004 at 05:48:20PM +0200, Cyrille Lefevre wrote: > "Bruce Evans" <bde@zeta.org.au> wrote: > > On Thu, 15 Apr 2004, Cyrille Lefevre wrote: > > > > > anyone interrested to validate and commit this PR ? > > > > I hope not. > > I hope yes since this was not the past agreement. > > http://tinyurl.com/3fraz > (http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=177270+0+archive/2002/freebsd-arch > /20020609.freebsd-arch) > > > <cite "Mike Barcroft"> > In the past versions of this conversation, the general agreement is that > going forward we should probably standardize on underscores to seperate > words. So, NO_FOO rather than NOFOO. However, no_volunteer has come > forward to do the work you've described, so if you're volunteering.... > </cite> > > I'd volunteer w/ "Ruslan Ermilov" and even do the job. > Well, it's been a while. ;-) I'm fine with doing it before we branch RELENG_5, and burning bridges the day we branch RELENG_6. Let's wait for some more feedback on arch@ though. If that doesn't work, I will talk to re@. It's also safe since we stay backwards compatible. Nice stuff! Cheers, -- Ruslan Ermilov ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAgDLvUkv4P6juNwoRAiKUAJ44ncneN2f3lpTFoFn+o/OSn79XjQCePxQQ 1giMbpp+dk1zah0bfQyN5Fc= =abgB -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040416192431.GC1584>