Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 17:36:38 -0400 From: Coleman Kane <cokane@FreeBSD.org> To: current@FreeBSD.org Cc: jhb@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Patch to fix crashing experienced while using GDB Message-ID: <1208208998.1279.54.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <1208208513.1279.51.camel@localhost> References: <1208208513.1279.51.camel@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-E45Aidnal28nVfcRzVLW Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 2008-04-14 at 17:28 -0400, Coleman Kane wrote: > Hello, >=20 > Some time ago, I got the attached patch from jhb (IIRC). It has worked > for me and cured a problem that was making a bunch of my code > un-traceable using GDB on FreeBSD. Debugging would result in a crash of > GDB, preventing me from seeing what bug I had that crashed my program. >=20 > Anyhow, my question is: Is there any reason this shouldn't be pushed > into the tree? Who do I need to talk to (obrien? the compiler > maintainers?) about it? BTW, this has already been fixed in the GDB sources (using nearly the exact same code) since August 2004 in rev. 1.79 of gdb/target.c: http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/gdb/target.c?rev=3D1.79&conten= t-type=3Dtext/x-cvsweb-markup&cvsroot=3Dsrc --=20 Coleman Kane --=-E45Aidnal28nVfcRzVLW Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (FreeBSD) iEYEABECAAYFAkgDzmQACgkQcMSxQcXat5fH/QCeK+qWkbh96H61P6xvc2NGYGXT BUQAnjbqt1ERE9dxVObf48Q+/8S6AzH2 =g3fU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-E45Aidnal28nVfcRzVLW--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1208208998.1279.54.camel>