Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2017 18:44:14 +0800 From: Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org> To: Jan Bramkamp <crest@rlwinm.de>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: openldap-client vs openldap-sasl-client Message-ID: <4c8d3ad3-156d-e5a4-0051-9b6e590530ce@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <34b66662-a2d7-706d-3653-e0ffc9bf81b2@rlwinm.de> References: <c798f1e9-92f0-1d2a-32e4-46dad59f05d0@FreeBSD.org> <34b66662-a2d7-706d-3653-e0ffc9bf81b2@rlwinm.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 5/01/2017 6:30 PM, Jan Bramkamp wrote: > On 04/01/2017 18:32, Andriy Gapon wrote: >> >> Do you I understand correctly that it is impossible now to install >> both samba44 >> and libreoffice using the official FreeBSD package repository? >> Or samba44 and KDE? >> >> If yes, then that sucks... similar happened recently with the two jpeg libraries. They can't be installed at the same time but some packages wanted one and some the other. > > Yes and yes it sucks. The "solution" is to build your own repo and > set the right flags to always use the same LDAP client port. With > binary packages and the speed of modern x86_64 systems I for one no > longer see removing SASL support from OpenLDAP as useful enough to > justify the complexity. Are there any reasons other than saved build > time to disable this dependency (e.g. a bad security track > record/process, different licenses)? > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4c8d3ad3-156d-e5a4-0051-9b6e590530ce>