Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 14 Nov 2016 15:12:10 +0100
From:      Franco Fichtner <franco@lastsummer.de>
To:        "Andrey V. Elsukov" <butcher@yandex-team.ru>
Cc:        freebsd-current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: netpfil with if_output and ip(6)_output
Message-ID:  <3E6A1786-613F-4ECF-8302-DB38B0213128@lastsummer.de>
In-Reply-To: <6980420c-a473-232b-5847-9aa4dd8eab66@yandex-team.ru>
References:  <2456B7E6-2425-4D86-A02B-33CE1EFEB608@lastsummer.de> <bcee818f-f6e4-a0ff-6dcd-01687cc8b909@yandex.ru> <EEB0E07C-37A6-4D30-ACEB-242EF7A6D22A@lastsummer.de> <6980420c-a473-232b-5847-9aa4dd8eab66@yandex-team.ru>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

> On 14 Nov 2016, at 2:36 PM, Andrey V. Elsukov <butcher@yandex-team.ru> =
wrote:
>=20
> On 14.11.2016 16:13, Franco Fichtner wrote:
>>> void ip6_flush_fwdtag(struct mbuf *m);
>>=20
>> This looks reasonable, thank you.  How would we proceed with the
>> implementation / porting of ipfw to the new framework?
>>=20
>=20
> Both ipfw and pf needs some patches. Also the generic *proto*_output
> should be modified. Currently I'm busy with IPsec related work, so if
> you will do this it will be very cool :)
> But if not, I can do some work after 2-3 weeks.

I will close the previous review and start on your proposal.  Should
have something concrete next week.


Many thanks,
Franco=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3E6A1786-613F-4ECF-8302-DB38B0213128>