Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 10:47:21 -0500 (EST) From: Jeff Roberson <jroberson@chesapeake.net> To: Eric Anderson <anderson@centtech.com> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ULE Interactivity perf patch Message-ID: <20031219104642.U36463-100000@mail.chesapeake.net> In-Reply-To: <3FE313DD.1080206@centtech.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 19 Dec 2003, Eric Anderson wrote: > Jeff Roberson wrote: > > >I realized a pitfal in the way that I'm doing slice assignment for > >interactive tasks. I'd like to have as many people test this as possible, > >in case there are unintended consequences. What this patch does is allow > >interactive tasks to have longer time-slices so that they may be more > >efficient. > > > >This patch is intended to fix the poor performance of some interactive > >processes while under high load, especially high load with other > >interactive tasks present. > > > > > No need to rebuild world, right? Just kernel? > Yep, just kernel. Make sure you have options SCHED_ULE. Cheers, Jeff > Eric > > -- > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > Eric Anderson Systems Administrator Centaur Technology > All generalizations are false, including this one. > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031219104642.U36463-100000>