Date: Sun, 30 Jun 1996 22:39:19 -0400 (EDT) From: Brian Tao <taob@io.org> To: Kenneth Merry <ken@ulc199.residence.gatech.edu> Cc: security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is "routed -q" necessary? Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.3.92.960630223103.18686P-100000@zap.io.org> In-Reply-To: <199607010044.UAA24617@ulc199.residence.gatech.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 30 Jun 1996, Kenneth Merry wrote:
>
> Well, there *might* be a reason to run routed, even if you only have
> one default router, and you hardwire the default router in ahead of
> time.
Is it possible to tell routed not to mess with the default route?
Our main router to the Internet for this subnet is a Cisco, but there
are also Ascends and Livingston PM-2e's providing routing for dialup
customers. I think I need to be running routed if I want to use a
classless routing protocol like RIPv2. We have a couple of Web
servers that each have a /25, which isn't possible with just RIP.
--
Brian Tao (BT300, taob@io.org, taob@ican.net)
Systems and Network Administrator, Internet Canada Corp.
"Though this be madness, yet there is method in't"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.NEB.3.92.960630223103.18686P-100000>