Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 8 Jul 2007 21:42:41 +0300
From:      "Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri" <almarrie@gmail.com>
To:        "Rene Ladan" <r.c.ladan@gmail.com>
Cc:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Marc UBM Bocklet <ubm@u-boot-man.de>
Subject:   Re: status of 7.0
Message-ID:  <499c70c0707081142x7a055787x67350667fb921cd2@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4690CFAA.30004@gmail.com>
References:  <8cdf6c720707070710k2b7e030v37683e460d983bf9@mail.gmail.com> <20070708111105.C9997@fledge.watson.org> <20070708132545.5604cbe9.ubm@u-boot-man.de> <4690CFAA.30004@gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 7/8/07, Rene Ladan <r.c.ladan@gmail.com> wrote:
> Marc UBM Bocklet schreef:
> >
> >
> > I'd like to do some testing, but I'm a little bit afraid of the upgrade
> > procedure 6.2-stable to -current. Is it possible to do a simple upgrade
> > if I follow the guidelines in UPGRADE or are there any hidden caveats?
> > (like "you've to recompile all installed ports", etc. :-))
> >
> [...don't try this on a production box...]

I run AMD64 arch in my server Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 with 2 GB of ram,
with SCHED_SMP and I have no real problems.

I did that to gain the SCHED peformance was done in 7.0 and MySQL
5.0.41 runs with no single issue or crash since 2 weeks with SCHED_SMP
and since 2 months with SCHED_ULE in both i386 and AMD64.

AMD64 runs MySQL faster, and Jeff removed more giant locked which made
it performs better.
So it's not a real problem trying it in heavy production server.

>
> HTH,
> Rene

-- 
Regards,

-Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri
Arab Portal
http://www.WeArab.Net/



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?499c70c0707081142x7a055787x67350667fb921cd2>