Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 13:22:29 -0800 From: "Nerius Landys" <nlandys@gmail.com> To: RW <fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: named and ntpd start order in rc.d Message-ID: <560f92640812051322h520ac67ficebbc3881907fbc2@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20081205190703.0dfb952d@gumby.homeunix.com> References: <560f92640811211647q551daccnaec4e8085bb8e042@mail.gmail.com> <20081205190703.0dfb952d@gumby.homeunix.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> This shouldn't be needed as ntpd already requires ntpdate and in > turn ntpdate requires named. The issue is probably timing - that named > isn't ready. Actually, the REQUIRE thing in the /etc/rc.d scripts means "if the required service is enabled, start it before this one". It does not mean "start the required service before this one". I had ntpd enabled but not ntpdate in my rc.conf. Therefore the ntpdate script which requires NETWORK and named did not get run. As mentioned earlier, my fix was to run ntpdate at bootup as well as ntpd.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?560f92640812051322h520ac67ficebbc3881907fbc2>