Date: 05 Jan 2000 10:55:37 +0100 From: Thomas Gellekum <tg@melaten.rwth-aachen.de> To: Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: HEADS UP: major number for libc_r bumped Message-ID: <kqaemkg7vq.fsf@cip12.melaten.rwth-aachen.de> In-Reply-To: Daniel Eischen's message of "Tue, 4 Jan 2000 10:30:41 -0500 (EST)" References: <200001041530.KAA06816@pcnet1.pcnet.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com> writes: > Thomas Gellekum <tg@melaten.rwth-aachen.de> wrote: > > due to some interface changes (different internal layout of pthread_t, > > POSIX compliant implementation of pthread_rwlockattr_setpshared()) I > > had to increase the major number of libc_r.so. > > pthread_t is just a pointer and the only thing that should be accessing > what it points to is libc_r. Yep, sorry for the sloppy wording. > Perhaps gdb with thread support, but I don't think that's brought > into -stable yet anyways. Not yet. I'll look at that when I bring in the growable stacks. No, there's no timeframe yet. tg To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?kqaemkg7vq.fsf>