Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 1 Feb 2001 08:39:22 +0000
From:      Josh Paetzel <jpaetzel@hutchtel.net>
To:        Cliff Sarginson <cliff@raggedclown.net>, "Cliff Sarginson" <cliff@raggedclown.net>, <darryl@osborne-ind.com>, <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   Re: ppp packet filtering
Message-ID:  <01020108404102.01820@mark9.vladsempire.net>
In-Reply-To: <E14OGzs-0000MW-00@post.mail.nl.demon.net>
References:  <E14OGzs-0000MW-00@post.mail.nl.demon.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 01 Feb 2001, Cliff Sarginson wrote:
> > 
> > Personally I use natd and ipfw if I have a static IP to deal with.  
> Interesting, may I ask why ?
> I have a static IP (but only a DOD modem connection)
> 

I find the rules for ipfw have more power and flexibility than the
rules for ppp.  I am also more familiar with them.

Josh


> Cliff
> 
> If I
> > am dealing with a dynamic IP I use ppp -nat and packet filtering.  I would
> > use ipfw with dynamic IP, but I haven't figured out a way to deal with the
> > dynamic IP, so I belive that ppp filtering is the only recourse that you
> > have.
> > 


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?01020108404102.01820>