Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 19:25:04 +0200 From: Michael Nottebrock <michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Cc: x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: XFree86 4.4 port ?? Message-ID: <200405211925.07300.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <20040521091011.GA67611@arved.at> References: <20040521022211.81086.qmail@web13423.mail.yahoo.com> <20040521091011.GA67611@arved.at>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Boundary-02=_ztjrA+7EMFfZzFE Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Friday 21 May 2004 11:10, Tilman Linneweh wrote: > * "Pedro F. Giffuni" [Fr, 21 Mai 2004 at 04:22 GMT]: > > I appreciate the great work that has been done lately to support the > > X.org server, but I recall there was a working port of Xfree86 4.4. Any > > *technical* reason why it hasn't been committed? > > Hi, thanks for raising this discussion, From my testing, I think there > are no technical reasons, that it can not be committed within 24 hours. I do think that having one X11 server(+libraries) in ports instead of two=20 (which on top of all else share lots of code and will make it supereasy for= =20 users to get messy, mixed installations) is a good thing - and that one=20 package should be X.org - for technical reasons. =2D-=20 ,_, | Michael Nottebrock | lofi@freebsd.org (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.freebsd.org \u/ | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org --Boundary-02=_ztjrA+7EMFfZzFE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBArjtzXhc68WspdLARAq7nAJ4kQso6QY86yo0EfYdeOa1Fy+8hHACfe7Fm RecYLKIo1Go3NbID3OMk3bo= =GZQ7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Boundary-02=_ztjrA+7EMFfZzFE--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200405211925.07300.michaelnottebrock>