Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2024 09:03:16 -0400 From: Ed Maste <emaste@freebsd.org> To: Warner Losh <imp@freebsd.org> Cc: src-committers@freebsd.org, dev-commits-src-all@freebsd.org, dev-commits-src-main@freebsd.org Subject: Re: git: 60f098f84119 - main - arch: Update to remove armv6 Message-ID: <CAPyFy2DF%2BASTGRrVsLh2vS7MzgE=jP5duUeT7i57_AgEM8rx%2Bg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <202407140600.46E60JKl047510@gitrepo.freebsd.org> References: <202407140600.46E60JKl047510@gitrepo.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 14 Jul 2024 at 02:00, Warner Losh <imp@freebsd.org> wrote: > > .Dv aarch64 > will support execution of > -.Dv armv6 > -or > .Dv armv7 > binaries if the CPU implements > .Dv AArch32 > -execution state, however older arm binaries aren't supported. > +execution state, however older arm binaries are not supported by > +.Fx . Do older 32-bit Arm userland binaries actually not work? Would "support execution of 32-bit Arm binaries if the CPU implements the AArch32 execution state" be accurate?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAPyFy2DF%2BASTGRrVsLh2vS7MzgE=jP5duUeT7i57_AgEM8rx%2Bg>