Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1998 15:43:18 -0500 From: Brian Cully <shmit@kublai.com> To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com>, Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: I almost hate to suggest this... Message-ID: <19981221154318.B21819@kublai.com> In-Reply-To: <81421.914056557@zippy.cdrom.com>; from Jordan K. Hubbard on Sat, Dec 19, 1998 at 12:35:57AM -0800 References: <199812190832.TAA26239@godzilla.zeta.org.au> <81421.914056557@zippy.cdrom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Dec 19, 1998 at 12:35:57AM -0800, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > > mount_foo should almost never be used directly. It should be in /libexec > > Then why have mount_foo at all? I think the right question is `why have mount_foo in /sbin at all?' The answer for which I do not know. :-) Bruce is right (of course), mount_foo should be in /libexec and mount itself should only have enough code to call the right program (like it does now, except that the UFS code wouldn't be there). -- Brian Cully <shmit@rcn.com> You think you're queer? I've got news for you: we're all queer. If you get befuddled by a middle class morality, shut it out. Shut it out.... Is there an absolute morality? I don't think so. You think so? Act that way. -- Glengarry Glen Ross To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19981221154318.B21819>